eResearch

Overview ORSP can Request Export Control Review on an Award based on their review of the Award and other applicable factors. The Request Export Control Review activity is available in all states and can be used multiple times, as needed. Navigation Role: ORSP > Award workspace
Overview If the Project Team answers either "Yes" or "Unsure" to the Proposal Approval Form (PAF) question, “Does the research project involve classified research or possible export controls?”, an export control review will automatically be requested. 
Overview Hardship Request: Hardships can only be requested by the U-M PI, Primary Research Administrator, and Reviewers from the Administrative Home Department, up until an Award is created. Hardships need to be created, signed by the U-M PI, and then routed for approval in eResearch Proposal Management (eRPM). Hardship Review:
Overview To request an amendment to an Active Technology Control Plan (TCP), the project team requests and submits a TCP amendment. An amendment can be requested for changes regarding a Time Extension, Research Personnel, to Update IT Security, Physical Security/Locations, or to Update Scope of Work. The TCP Amendment can be edited/completed by: Project Team members (UFA Personnel) with edit rights to the TCP; Export Control Office (ECO).
Overview After routing the TCP to the Export Control Office (ECO), the ECO will review it and determine if changes are needed. If a change is needed, the PI/Project Team will need to respond to the requested changes. This procedure contains instructions for making or declining changes requested by the ECO. The PI and Project Team members will receive an email requesting changes. The TCP will be in the state of "ECO Review – Personnel Making Changes". 
OverviewThis document outlines the compliance changes occurring for Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Approval, as well as updates to Export Controls/Classified Research, effective with the following eRPM releases:
OverviewCertain U.S. Federal Government agencies may include Risk Mitigation (Research Security) requirements in sponsored project agreements/amendments that require Research Security Information Oversight to review and take action prior to U-M Office of Research and Sponsored Projects (ORSP) acceptance of these agreements/amendments.eResearch Proposal Management (eRPM) is used to communicate and track requests, responses, reviews, records, and documents related to sponsor-initiated Risk Mitigation (Research Security) requirements and concerns.
Overview The Return Signed Contract activity is available in the state of "Awaiting PI Signature." It allows all Award Editors and Reviewers of the Administrative Home chain to return the Award (AWD) or Award Modification (AWD-MOD) to ORSP for processing and includes the ability to upload a PDF of the signed award agreement. Navigation Role: PI & Project Team > Home workspace Awards tab > Award (AWD) / Award Modification (AWD-MOD) workspace OR eRPM email notification link to AWD/AWD-MOD.
Overview After a Technology Control Plan (TCP) Amendment has been requested and submitted, it can be reviewed by the Export Control Office (ECO) to determine if changes are needed, if it can be sent to Project Team personnel for signature/approval, or if it should be cancelled. After a TCP Amendment has obtained all the required signatures, the ECO office can then complete a TCP Amendment. Navigation Role: Export Control > Home Workspace (My Home) > ECA Inbox tab
Overview Refer to the Agreement Acceptance Process for a description of the terms that require review and approval by various parties, including Unit Reviewers. The steps for the PI to review and sign an Agreement Acceptance Request are listed below. Navigation Role: PI & Project Team > Home Workspace